|
Real Threat of United Nations
Not Being Debated
The attitude prevails on
Capitol Hill that the United Nations has a negative
image simply because it is bloated with a bad bureaucracy. Most
Congressmen who express opposition to the UN do so because they say it
spends beyond its means, it's arrogant and is an ungrateful tenant on the
Hudson.
Many Republicans object to the use of
American soldiers for peace-keeping missions, particularly when those
soldiers are placed under the command of foreign officers.
Still, most in Congress, Republican and
Democrat, defend the need for the United Nations arguing that the world
desperately needs a place for nations to hold debates and air differences
as a prevention to war. Most Americans who have a favorable view of the
world body are reacting to the UN's well-crafted image as a sort of
international Red Cross that moves into disaster areas and keeps the peace
and feeds refugees.
Because these attitudes and images
prevail, it is difficult to conduct an
honest debate on the true dangers of the United Nations. But, as bad as a
bloated, out-of-control bureaucracy may be, and as enraged as Americans
get over U.S. troops under control of foreign generals, these are not the
real reasons why Americans should fear and loath the United Nations.
There is a much more dangerous agenda
afoot in the bowels of the building on the Hudson. And if it is not
addressed in a serious manner very soon, America will find itself merged
into the international community in much
the same way independent European nations are being melted into one union
on the Continent. As has been reported over and over again, it is the use
of supposed environmental disasters that is the driving force behind the
success of the UN takeover.
Starting in 1987 the United Nations began
its final drive to restructure the world's nations into one global
village. That year the UN issued a report on so-called environmental
disasters, particularly focusing on global warming, ozone holes, poverty
of third world nations and over-population. The solution, said the UN
report, could only be "a worldwide political transformation that
supported sustainable development."
That transformation, according to UN
documents, would include the down-sizing of cities and towns into new
"urban clusters" where workplaces, housing and nature are
blended together." America's elected form of government would be
changed to include appointed federal agents and unelected members of
private organizations, called "non-governmental organization"
(NGO's) dictating policy at the local level. Provisions granting NGO's
such power are actually written into the treaties coming out of the
conferences and, once signed by the United States, become international
law.
To promote that agenda the UN has held a
series of these conferences around the world, each focusing on specific
aspects for worldwide restructuring.
In Vienna the focus was on human rights,
particularly the rights of children over their parents. In Cairo, forced
abortion and sterilization were put forth as solutions for population
control. In Copenhagen the United Nations revealed its daring plan for
global taxes that would help finance the international restructuring
scheme called for in the environmental agenda.
The payment of such taxes would also help finance the UN's own independent
army for enforcement purposes.
In June, 1992 the UN sponsored the Earth
Summit in Rio de Janeiro - the largest and most ambitious international
conference of all time.
Here, five major documents - to define
and implement the sustainable development agenda - were negotiated.
First was the "Convention on Climate
Change" that was to address the issue of global warming. Final draft
of that Convention, or treaty, is to be signed this coming December.
Regardless of the fact that the theory of global warming has yet to be
proven by peer-reviewed science, this treaty will force the industrial
nations to pull back emissions output to 1990 levels. Such strict
regulations will force industry out of business, cut back on American
power output by as much as 60 percent, and place massive consumption taxes
on energy. That will drastically increase the price of every item in your
home that is powered through the use of energy.
The real purpose of the Climate Change
treaty is to redistribute technology and production to undeveloped third
world nations - because, incredibly, those nations won't have to sign the
treaty or be forced to obey its dictates. The treaty has nothing to do
with protecting the environment. Only sixteen industrial nations will be
bound by the treaty. The Climate Change Treaty will bankrupt the United
States.
The second treaty negotiated in Rio was
the "Biodiversity Treaty." As yet unratified by the United
States Senate, this treaty would declare 50 percent of all the land in
every state as wilderness. American cities would be downsized, technology
and industry would be reduced and strict zoning laws would curtail
development of our cities.
The third paper from the Summit was the
"Rio Declaration" which called for
the eradication of poverty throughout the world. What it really provides
is a plan for more redistribution of the world’s wealth - particularly
away from the United States.
The fourth document from Rio was the
"Convention on Forest Principles" calling for international
management of the worlds forests, which would essentially shut down the
timber industry.
And the fifth document coming out of Rio
was "Agenda 21." This one document contained the full agenda for
implementing worldwide sustainable development. That plan was later
elaborated upon in Istanbul, Turkey at the UN conference called Habitat
II, last June. In a document produced by the United
States department of Housing and Urban Development (HUD), at the request
of the UN for Habitat II, the blueprint was set for how American cities
and towns would be restructured for sustainable develoment. To achieve
rapid transition, the document said, all citizens will be trained to
think of "ecology, or
the diverse systems of earth's biosphere, as the basis" for every
human activity.
Do these programs sound compatible with
the Constitution of the United States? Does the UN agenda sound like
something the United States should be helping to impose around the world?
Can you see the patterns of redistribution and restructuring that drives
the UN agenda?
As you can see, the United Nations'
global restructuring agenda is much more dangerous than Congress' current
debate over bloated budgets and peacekeeping forces. American taxpayers
and their private property are the target being lustfully coveted by the
power elite of the United Nations.
The UN is an open and direct threat to
the sovereignty and constitutional rights of all Americans. The UN has
chosen to set the agenda. The
UN has chosen to make itself more than an international debating society.
The UN has decided that it wants more power. These are the real reasons
why the United States must take drastic and forceful action by getting
completely out of the UN - a world body out of control.
The facts are simple. Without U.S.
participation, there will be no United Nation to attack and loot the U.S.
treasury. Above all, the United States doesn't need the UN to conduct
foreign policy or rule or regulate international trade. The United Nations
needs the United States for its survival. But the UN threatens the
survival of the United States.
Congressman Don Young of Alaska is
certainly addressing the threat with his American Sovereignty Protection
Act. That bill will take the teeth out of the UN treaties by requiring
Congressional oversight before the U.S. bureaucracy can implement their
provisions.
But clearly the UN has no intention of
"reforming" itself other than to get worse. There truly is no
other action the United States can safely take except to get completely
away from the threat of the UN. Because of the UN's own lust for power,
the U.S. has no choice but to withdraw.
Congressman Ron Paul of Texas has
introduced the bill to take the U.S. completely out of the UN. His bill,
"The American Sovereignty Restoration Act,"
(H.R.1146) pulls no punches as it calls for repeal of the United Nations
Participation Act of 1945, ending U.S. participation in the UN.
But Paul's bill goes even further. It
would close the UN headquarters in New York. And H.R.1146 will end all
U.S. participation in the UN's environmental agenda, repeal American
participation in UNESCO, repeal diplomatic immunity for UN personnel, will
pay no U.S. funds to the UN, and that includes stopping funds or U.S.
participation in UN peacekeeping operations.
Most importantly, Congressman Paul's bill
will force intense debate and shine a much needed light on the UN's real
agenda - one that will result in the restructuring of the entire world.
Americans are now mostly in the dark
about the UN's true agenda and its dangers to American freedom. America
desperately needs that debate. America needs to enact Ron Paul's American
Sovereignty Restoration Act - now.
Back
to main U.N. Free Zone page
|
