American Policy Center




Home
About the Center
Education
United Nations
Property Rights
Privacy Rights
Immigration
DeWeese Report
Action Central
More Issues
Contact Us




Sign Our Petition




Congress Links
Write Your Congressman

Liberty Links
Liberty Links

 

Return to article index

United States House of Representatives

The votes depicted on the chart show how each Representative either supported or opposed the pro-sovereignty position.

Simply locate your Representative to view his or her cumulative pro-sovereignty rating. You may also view each individual vote by using the descriptions on this page. The pro-sovereignty position (located near the top of the chart) shows how those who support national sovereignty and American independence believe your Representative should have voted on each issue.

U.S. House Votes

Vote #1: H.R. 1794: American Servicemembers Protection Act (voted on as H. Amdt. 31 to H.R. 1646).

Vote: May 10, 2001
Sponsor: Rep. Tom DeLay (R-TX)
This amendment to the State Department appropriations bill provides legal protections to ensure that American citizens, especially military personnel, are not prosecuted by the UN’s International Criminal Court (ICC). The ICC, already established and underway, is one of the greatest threats to American sovereignty.
The amendment was passed 282-137.
Republicans 205-4; Democrats 76-132.
Pro-U.S. Sovereignty Position: SUPPORT

 

Vote #4: H. Amdt. 191 to H.R. 2500: An amendment to prohibit the use of funds for use toward any U.S. contribution for UN peacekeeping operations.

Vote: July 18, 2001
Sponsor: Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX)
This amendment would have eliminated U.S. funding in the appropriations bill for the support of any United Nations peacekeeping missions. "U.N. peacekeeping" has long been considered a dubious term. The U.N. often engages haphazardly in conflicts of zero consequence to the U.S., yet expects U.S. lives to be risked in the fighting.
The amendment was defeated 71-359.
Republicans 67-153; Democrats 3-205.
Pro-U.S. Sovereignty Position: SUPPORT

Vote #2: H. Amdt. 33 to H.R. 1646: Amendment to strike funding for payment of funds required by the U.S. to rejoin the U.N. Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

Vote: May 10, 2001
Sponsor: Rep. Tom Tancredo (R-CO)
This amendment to the appropriations bill would have stricken funding and prevented the U.S. from rejoining UNESCO. UNESCO is an educational program by which the U.N. seeks to instill an anti-national sovereignty and pro-globalism mindset in children around the world.
The amendment was defeated 193-225.
Republicans 183-27; Democrats 9-197.
Pro-U.S. Sovereignty Position: SUPPORT

Vote #5: H. Amdt. 190 to H.R. 2500: Amendment sought to eliminate the authorization of funding for the United Nations or any agency affiliated with the U.N.

Vote: July 18, 2001
Sponsor: Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX)
This House amendment would have eliminated U.S. funding for the U.N. and any UN-affiliated agency under the appropriations bill. Its passage would have ensured that various U.N. efforts that seek to undermine U.S. sovereignty would not receive American taxpayer dollars.
The amendment was defeated 62-364.
Republicans 56-164; Democrats 5-199.
Pro-U.S. Sovereignty Position: SUPPORT

Vote #3: H. Amdt. 480 to H.R. 4546: Prohibiting funds from being used to assist, cooperate with, or provide any support to the U.N. International Criminal Court.

Vote: May 10, 2002
Sponsors: Rep. Ron Paul (R-TX)
This amendment would have prevented any funds authorized in the Defense Department appropriations bill from being used to support the U.N.’s International Criminal Court (ICC) in any way. The ICC is the U.N.’s attempt to supercede the authority of the U.S. judicial system and possibly try U.S. citizens for politically spiteful reasons.
The amendment was passed 264-152.
Republicans 204-8; Democrats 59-143.
Pro-U.S. Sovereignty Position: SUPPORT

 

next>

 

© 2008 American Policy Center

Web site design and maintenance by Mangobone Web Services
Web hosting provided by Host Country USA