By
Peyton Knight
Pop
quiz!
Who
should make the decision whether or not to raze your decrepit, century-old home
and build a new one in its place?
A)
Your local government.
B)
Your neighbors.
C)
Both A and B.
D)
You.
If
you answered D, you obviously don’t live in West Bridgewater, Connecticut, where
your neighbors and the local government want to call the shots on your property.
The
West Bridgewater Historical Commission announced in early October that it wants
to create a “demolition delay bylaw” whereby any property owner who wishes to
demolish his old, decrepit home and replace it with a new one, must file a “notice
of intent to demolish a significant building” and wait for up to half a year to
receive (or not receive) a “demolition
permit.”
Once
a property owner files his request to do want he wants to with his property, the
Historical Committee schedules a public hearing on the matter and the property
owner is required to post a notice of the public hearing that is visible from
the nearest public way. After the public hearing, the Commission is given 21 days to cast
its judgment and decide whether the property owner’s plans to do what he wants
with his property conflict with what
South Boston’s The Enterprise describes
as “West Bridgewater's historical, cultural or architectural heritage or resources.”
In other words, the property owner is screwed.
Historical
Commission Chairwoman Francine Sheedy claims that this is just “a delay” or “review
process.” She waxes bureaucratic, saying the trampling of a homeowner’s property
rights simply “allows a community to give a property a second chance.”
Usually
these bleeding hearts reserve second chances for felons and convicts.
Now in West Bridgewater, 100-year-old homes are given more rights than
their owners, who of course, have no chance.
Stealing Property Rights in the Name of Dust Control
The
Grossglasses, a family of motocross enthusiasts, were recently looking to purchase
some land in the Anza Valley, California, region to have a place to ride their
motorbikes with their 11-year-old son, Johnny.
Not
so fast.
According
to the North County Times, a proposed
Riverside County ordinance “would, for the first time, establish rules for riding
motorcycles, dune buggies and other off-road vehicles on private
property within the county’s vast unincorporated areas.” (emphasis added)
Endangered
plants and animals, view-sheds, noise pollution, and just plain good ol’ environmental
awareness have all been offered up as reasons to clamp down on property owners
in Riverside.
The
Times reports that county planners are
proposing “that off-road families own at least five acres, live on the property,
limit riding to two people at a time…Hours of riding would be limited to 10 a.m.
to 4 p.m. in winter and 10 a.m. to 6 p.m. during summer.
No one could start engines on Thanksgiving, Christmas and New Year’s Day.”
Remember,
all these rules and regulations are for private property. Deputy Planning Director Mark Balys claims
that neighbor complaints of dust being kicked-up and engine noise are the reasons
for action. Of course, there are already
common sense “nuisance” laws whereby neighbors can resolve these matters.
But this isn’t about common sense. It’s about eliminating off-road recreation.
“What
they have come up with is absolutely, utterly, totally insane,” says Meg Grossglass.
“It’s just an outrageous infringement on private property rights.”
When
off-road enthusiasts and families like the Grossglasses are booted from designated
trails in state and national parks, they’re told that if they want to enjoy their
hobby, they need to enjoy it on their own property.
Now they can’t even do that—unless they can afford to purchase a minimum
of five acres. And even then, they can’t ride as a family
on their own property given the two-riders-at-a-time rule.
The
way things are going, there may soon be no place left to ride—which is exactly
what radical environmentalists want.
Peyton
Knight is the Executive Director of the American Policy Center, a grassroots,
activist think tank headquartered in Warrenton, Virginia. The Center maintains
an Internet site at www.americanpolicy.org.