Dispatches From the
Front Lines of the War on Privacy
Government Computer To
Decide Who is a Terrorist
The Federal Aviation Administration ( FAA) has announced that is will
implement a new computer system called Computer Assisted Passenger
Screening (CAPS) to profile and evaluate airline passengers before they
get on planes. The computer will be trying to determine if a passenger is
a terrorist by analyzing "suspicious" characteristics.
Although bureaucrats won’t reveal the specific "suspicious"
profiles they’re looking for, experts speculate that traveling alone,
buying your ticket at the last minute, visiting unapproved foreign
countries, or frequent travel could get you tagged as a possible
terrorist. Passengers could also be picked at random.
If you fit the "terrorist profile," security agents could
pull you out of line, search your luggage, interrogate you about your
travel plans, tag your luggage with bright orange labels, or escort you
onto the plane. In a worst-case scenario, you could be x-rayed, or
subjected to a body cavity search.
"CAPS will turn air travel into computerized Russian roulette,
where a microchip will decide if security agents should detain or search
you, " said Steve Dasbach, National Director of the Libertarian
Party. "Last year, 50,892 airline passengers underwent some kind of
body search by airport personnel. You could be next – even if you are
100% innocent of any crime – and their excuse will be: ‘The computer
made me do it.’"
Concluded Dasbach, "The Fourth Amendment guarantees protection
against unreasonable search and seizure. There’s no exception that says
‘unless a computer program says you’re guilty.’ Innocent Americans
shouldn’t be treated like terrorists because a computer chip doesn’t
like them."
BIG BROTHER’S BLACK BOXES IN YOUR CAR
It’s doubtful that your General Motors car salesman told you about
the extra accessory hidden under the hood. It’s a small silver box
(called a black box after the device of the same name on airplanes) that
records every detail about the operation of the car. It constantly
monitors the car’s speed, its throttle position, the engine’s RPM and
whether the driver is wearing a seat belt. Upon a crash impact, the box
stops recording and saves the last five seconds of information.
Supporters of the idea say will give accident investigators and
insurance companies the key to what actually happened in the final moments
before a crash.
However, privacy-rights advocates reason that since the information
could put a car owner at fault, the boxes will make it easier for
insurance companies to refuse to pay claims. In fact, the box has the
capacity to incriminate the driver. "It’s like having a cop and an
insurance agent riding in the back seat," says reporter Elizabeth
Wilberg.
Moreover, the black boxes may signal a more vigorous surveillance to
come. Insurance companies may lobby for full access to the boxes. Says
Charles Langley of the Utility Consumers Action Network, "In the
wrong hands, it can do the consumer wrong."
One question to proponents comes to mind. If the black box is just an
innocent, but valuable tool for safety, why doesn’t GM advertise that
the devises are in the car? Is it a secret?
CALIFORNIA GROCERY CHAIN PULLS DISCOUNT
CARDS
Nob Hill Foods, a chain of grocery stores has decided to pull its
discount card program due to customer’s concerns over privacy. The
discount card gives the store a tracking device to show what each customer
buys and that individual’s shopping pattern. The discount card is used
by many other grocery store chains. The card gives special discounts that
aren’t available to people who pay by cash, check or credit.
The privacy concern is over third parties accessing this information.
For example, it a person buys cigarettes and the information is passed to
that person’s insurance company, the individual could be denied
coverage.
Privacy Papers, Free Congress Foundation, 717 Second
Street, NE, Washington, DC 20002
|