Congressman Paul Leads Fight To Block
Federal ID Cards
By Tom DeWeese, President
American Policy Center
In the June issue of the Insider's
Report, I told you that federal law now requires all states to issue
driver's licenses with fingerprint IDs by October 2000. Though the
conclusion of my report was accurate, one major point was not. Contrary to
my report, Section 656 of the federal law does not mandate fingerprinting.
To find the hidden regulations that lead to mandatory fingerprinting one
must go on a legislative scavenger hunt. Here's the whole story.
FINDING THE HIDDEN FINGERPRINT
REGULATIONS
STEP A: In 1996 Congress passed the
Illegal Immigration Reform and Immigration Responsibility Act. Section
656b of that Act, titled "State-issued Driver's Licenses and
Comparable Documents," requires Federal Agencies to prohibit the use
of state driver's licenses unless they conform to standards authorized by
the Secretary of Transportation. The Act ordered the Department of
Transportation to provide those regulations within one year of passage of
the Act. The Act also ordered states to use the Social Security number as
the "unique numeric identifier."
Other than the mandatory use of the
Social Security number, the Act did not spell out the specifics of other
identification processes to be used in the new cards in order to comply
with DOT regulations. The Act did not mandate the use of fingerprinting.
Instead, the Act stated, "The license or document otherwise shall be
in form consistent with requirements set forth in regulations promulgated
by the Secretary of Transportation AFTER consultation with the American
Association of Motor Vehicle Administrators (AAMVA)." These are the
people who run each state's Department of Motor Vehicles (DMV).
STEP B: On Wednesday, June 17th,
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration of the U.S. Department
of Transportation complied with Section 656 of the Act and published the
proposed regulations entitled "Driver's License/SSN/National
Identification Document." Again, in the regulations, the DOT skips
around the mandating of finger printing. Instead, the regulations quote
the Act, again stating that the "form" of the driver's licenses
will be determined after "consultation with the AAMVA."
STEP C: So, what recommendations
are we to expect from these consultations with the AAMVA? There are at
least two very revealing clues found on the hidden trail leading to finger
printing. The first can be found in the AAMVA magazine called
"MOVE."
In the Fall, 1997 edition, in an article
entitled "BIOMETRIC APPLICATIONS - BIG BOON OR BIG BROTHER," the
AAMVA's intentions are clear. Declaring the driver's license to be the
accepted identification document, the article sought to find solutions to
consumer fraud. Said the article; "the answer might be right at their
fingertips."
The article goes on to describe the
technology of "biometrics," including unique individual
characteristics "such as fingerprints, facial structure, or structure
of the eye's retina." A Dr. Jim Wayman is introduced as the man
picked by the Federal Highway Safety Administration (FHSA) to study which
method of biometrics to use. It's Dr. Wayman's job to determine
"appropriate fingerprinting standards for use." Dr. Wayman
recommends that "jurisdictions be consistent in which finger they use
for imaging. If standards and fingers are not consistent, jurisdictions
won't be able to exchange and compare information." Dr. Wayman
concluded: "AAMVA's got to make those decisions; AAMVA must set the
standards."
And there is a second piece of evidence
pointing to the AAMVA as the designated villain who will fingerprint us
all. Any American may contact their local DMV and ask for DMV guidelines
for the design of driver licenses. Inquiries will be answered with a
booklet, published by the U.S. Department of Transportation, "in
cooperation with the AAMVA." Title of the booklet is "DRIVER
LICENSE APPLICANT IDENTIFICATION AND LICENSING SYSTEM SECURITY,"
document number DOT HS 803 800. Page eight, section four of this document
says: "The right thumb or index finger print should appear on all
applications for a driver license."
CONCLUSION: A NATIONAL ID CARD WITH YOUR
FINGERPRINT
There simply can be no question that the
federal government is moving rapidly to implement national fingerprinting
on a national ID card that we will soon all be required to carry. Those,
like Senators Diane Feinstein and Ted Kennedy, who helped push Section 656
into the Illegal Immigration Act, along with the Department of
Transportation and the AAMVA, have apparently worked hard to hide their
national ID plans, and especially the fingerprinting scheme, from the
American public.
The DOT regulations mandate that states
comply. If driver licenses in any state fail to meet DOT standards,
citizens of that state will not be able to participate in routine,
life-essential function after the imposed federal deadline of October 1,
2000.
And what are the services that will be
affected by the national ID card? Here are just few items:
- AIR TRAVEL: The White House Commission
on Aviation Safety and Security, chaired by Vice president Al Gore,
directed the Federal Aviation Administration to issue new guidelines
regarding identification of air travelers, which includes presentation
of appropriate ID prior to boarding. Also, under the new DOT
regulations, no one could make application for a new passport or
passport renewal without presenting the national ID.
- BANKING: The FBI's Financial Center (FINCEN)
that monitors all foreign and domestic financial transactions has
required banks to confirm the identity and Social Security number of
all account holders. Account holders that do not present the
appropriate identification must have taxes withheld from their account
balances to prevent "tax evasion." Under the new
regulations, banks will not be able to establish new accounts nor cash
checks for anyone who does not use the national ID.
- EMPLOYMENT: The federally mandated
"New Hires Database" and the "Employment Eligibility
Confirmation System" requires EVERY employer in the country to
submit detailed information about every new employee or employee that
has changed status as of October 1, 1997. This is done in the name of
catching "deadbeat" parents. However, employees will not be
allowed to use any ID that does not conform to the national ID
standards.
- MEDICAL CARE: In September of 1997,
Health and Human Services Secretary Donna Shalala announced
recommendations for "medical records privacy." Her
guidelines included the establishment of a "unique patient
identifier," and the centralization of all medical records on a
federal computer system that allows law enforcement to have access to
your medical information without a warrant. Having already stated her
desired requirements, it is certain that the national ID will be
incorporated into any medical record rules issued by HHS Secretary
Shalala.
- MEDICARE, MEDICAID, and SOCIAL
SECURITY: The new regulations will directly prohibit anyone from
receiving any federal social support services without having a
national ID card.
- PURCHASE OF FIREARMS: Part 2 of the
Brady Law requires the presentation of an acceptable form of ID to
confirm the identity of all firearm purchasers. Under both the current
Brady system and the proposed National Criminal Background Check
System, the FBI will not approve a transaction to anyone not using a
national ID card after the October 1, 2000 date.
DOES THIS FRIGHTEN YOU?
Are you concerned that the federal
government is moving to put a national ID system in place? I have
received letters and notes from several supporters of the American
Policy Center who say they are not. They say they are more concerned
with catching deadbeat dads and illegal aliens. Some have said they
would gladly put their thumbprints on a national ID card, "just
to catch these lawbreakers." To tell you the truth, that attitude
frightens me as much as the government's actions.
At the very least, a central federal
computer system is being designed that will affect your ability to
earn a living. In this one card will be the power to deny you a job,
the ability to move from one place to another and to obtain medical
services.
Once this system is in place,
national ID cards will come complete with computer chips that will
include medical records, school records, employment records, tax
records and possible arrest records. It will be your source of money,
as cash is replaced with "smart cards" that also serve as
credit cards and ATM cards.
Who will be running the computers
that contain all of this life-giving information? Answer: Government
bureaucrats earning minimum wage. It has been estimated that nearly
thirty percent of all of the information currently stored in
government data banks is incorrect. If you have tried to purchase a
home in recent years, you probably had to go through the nightmare of
correcting the errors in your credit report before the mortgage loan
would be approved. Imagine what would happen if incorrect information
kept you from getting a job or purchasing groceries with your one-stop
government-approved national ID card?
What if an error in the card
indicated that you were wanted by the FBI? Who would you turn to for
correcting the information? If you like dealing with the IRS you will
love the new America under the new national ID system.
There is always a reasonable,
innocent-sounding reason to surrender liberty for security. Illegal
aliens are a terrible problem in this country. Something must be done
before we are overrun. Deadbeat dads must be brought to justice - or
we will all pay for their free ride and lack of responsibility. There
are some who passionately argue the need to put computer chips under
the skin of children. That way, if the child is abducted or runs away,
they can be located and returned.
But turning all Americans into
criminals to catch a few is opening the door to pure, uncontrolled
tyranny. Personal information in the hands of a stranger is a perfect
setting for fraud and corruption. There is no way to control it.
The favorite defense of the social
planners is that only criminals have to fear the system. As long as
you are law abiding, you have nothing to worry about. Really? And who
is to say what will be illegal tomorrow - once the system is in place?
First the system will be used to
locate illegal aliens and deadbeat dads. Then an exception will be
made to use the system to track down welfare cheats and then those who
may have sexually transmitted diseases. All worthy exceptions. We
don't mind, do we? No bother to us. We are innocent.
What if a new administration should
come into power, armed with new laws? What if the new President said,
"let's use the system to track down now-illegal guns?" Or
what if you wrote a letter to the editor last year attacking the
administration's policies? What if the angered administration should
decide to get even? At the whim of a government bureaucrat you could
find your ability to travel cancelled; your checking accounts frozen;
your job gone. In short, you can't run and you can't hide.
Is this really the America you want
to live in? Do you really favor allowing such an uncontrollable system
to be put into place? Will you also accept television-monitoring
devices to be placed in your home so the government can make sure no
illegal activity is taking place? It sure would be more efficient that
putting cops out on the streets.
One of the greatest protections
Americans have always had against invasive government power is the
government's inability to keep track of our every movement. Allow the
federal government to obtain that ability and there is simply no
control over government.
THE CONGRESSIONAL EFFORT TO STOP THE
NATIONAL ID
These new national ID regulations
violate every notion of federalism, because they force states to
comply with regulations issued by the federal government without
constitutional authority to do so. Nor are federal agencies empowered
to force states to gather detailed information on every person in
order to comply with federal mandates.
That's why Congressman Ron Paul has
introduced the "Freedom and Privacy Restoration Act of 1998"
to repeal Section 656 from the Illegal Immigration Reform and
Immigrant Responsibility Act. In introducing his Bill, Congressman
Paul said, 'the establishment of a 'national' driver's license and
birth certificate makes a mockery of the 10th amendment and the
principles of federalism." He went on to say, "what would
the founding fathers say if they knew the limited federal government
they bequeathed to future generations would have grown to such a size
that it claims power to demand all Americans obtain a federally
-approved ID before getting a job?"
It is imperative that all
freedom-loving Americans call their elected representatives to demand
they support Congressman Paul's bill to restore American liberty and
stop the implementation of a national ID card system.
As Benjamin Franklin once said,
"those who would give up essential liberty for temporary security
deserve neither liberty nor security. "
|